Our PDF Library :
ckick the icon to download or the link below it to open in a new tab
Case Law :
- Devine Supreme Court after High Court and Upper Tribunal (Land Registry) - The Devine Case 2020
https://covenant3.odoo.com/web/content/1299?unique=2de9bfe66ca3df7803b5e8e2974f310e32d84018&
2. Wrotham Park nor the Devine Case now any warning or deterrent to strategic private profit Care Home breaching of Covenants under Barrister and Solicitor defence advice.
coming soon
3 Coven - Section 84 1925 Law of Property Act due process and acceptable Children's Home behaviour - The Coven Case December 3rd 2024
a full investigation also into Lichfield Council none publishing of Certificate of Lawful Use Applications starting at some point in early 2023.
coming soon
4. Burns v Harmony Children's services ltd 21st Feb 2025 - Leeds County Court small claims track
The horrific small claims case where the breaching party was awarded £3000 costs against a Beneficiary trying to get the Case to the correct Jurisdiction of the Land Registry - no busines use covenant ignored in a case that ended with the word 'Limited' - procedural defence beat justice and case source causation of evasion of the Tribunal with Jurisdiction - the UT.
This case warns all Litigant in Persons to stay well clear of the Online Money Claims Service (it produced the pdf that was rejected under CPR16) and the small claims track Court, due to the interpretation by the Court of CPR 27.14 (2) (g) - unreasonable interpretation of unreasonable, weight of arms and causation.
- DO NOT GO TO THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT IS OUR ADVICE AFTER WITNESSING THIS CASE BE ROUTED TO CPR 27.14 (2) (g).
Deliberate breach of Covenant not seen as causation for claim and the original unreasonable aspect (UT Evasion) of the case never weighed.
https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/make-claim
All our trust in the Court died on this day as the first page of evidence showing false information used in obtaining the Certificate was never weighed. Possibly never even read. The Certifcate had been obtained months before purchase. The Deed restrictions obtained even before the Certificate and that from a source of false information signed to be true =
It must be viewed, at least on this day, as not separate from Govt. in our opinion.
Only breaking the law in 'a limited and specific way' rides again.
Another related case then pulled so that the weaponisation of Costs could not wipe out the Beneficiary funds to search for Justice.
- Let the case instead be a warning as seemed to be the intention of the Legal Industry profession and the decision.
Our Judgement - This is not the Country you think it is. CPR 1.1 easily undermined and litigant in persons wiped from the field. Shame only on the Judges that built this framework of exclusion of the common person.
'DEVELOP NOW' and the stolen march with manufactured emotive situation on the ground wins under existing LAW FRAMEWORK if you make any strike out worthy procedural error. The strike out instigates a 'blood in the water cost attack' by the sharks of the breaching side, inexplicably placed onto the front foot by Court CPR.
So this is a dirty industry and eyes wide open into it you must go.
The destination has to be a new Case that the Public can find to show how these actions are remedied, for none evidently exist with sufficent weight of warning or that work to maintain Public Trust.
Council Complaint and LGO Responses :
Whitewash helping to cover up Corporate partner false information signed to be true and their strategic breaching of Covenant. Bringing all into disrepute.
Second Complaint
Third Complaint
ttps://covenant3.odoo.com/web/content/1299?unique=2de9bfe66ca3df7803b5e8e2974f310e32d84018&
LGO response
https://covenant3.odoo.com/web/content/1299?unique=2de9bfe66ca3df7803b5e8e2974f310e32d84018&